Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22464 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91505 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Mar 2006 16:16:54 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91490 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2006 16:16:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2006 16:16:54 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([212.112.227.169:40448] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 19/A3-55982-5FD38144 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:16:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2F8DF0133; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:16:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ipx11223 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19188-08; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:16:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i577B575A.versanet.de [87.123.87.90]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035EBDF00C0; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:16:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <44183DE7.2000307@php.net> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:16:39 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky , Kevin Waterson , internals@lists.php.net References: <20060316010210.5f76c9f5.kevin@oceania.net> <441828B4.4030007@prohost.org> <44183B04.7010207@php.net> In-Reply-To: <44183B04.7010207@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] phps line numbering From: lsmith@php.net (Lukas Smith) Lukas Smith wrote: > Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >> I'd consider it for PHP6, but not for PHP5.1 at least not at this time. > > what exactly is the big deal with adding a new optional parameter? > i dont really see the huge impact that should push this feature back to > the next major php version. its something that could go into any minor > version. maybe i should clarify that i am only concered about the highlight_file(9 and highlight_string() functions. i dont even think we should add linenumbers to .phps. regards, Lukas