Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22258
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
To: internals@lists.php.net,Steph Fox <steph@zend.com>
Message-ID: <440F5364.7070200@php.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:57:56 +0100
Reply-To: toggg@php.net
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
References: <000001c641c9$80dbfad0$6e02a8c0@thinkpad> <440F4C95.4080700@toggg.com> <1cec01c642f7$9df2fae0$6402a8c0@foxbox>
In-Reply-To: <1cec01c642f7$9df2fae0$6402a8c0@foxbox>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL
From: toggg@php.net (bertrand Gugger)

Steph Fox wrote:
>> I'm not concerned by the vote.
> 
> 
> Please, Bertrand, the goto/labelled breaks discussions were held ad 
> infinitum last June, and back in December, and again more recently. The 
> _only_ concern now is the vote. Anything else will lead to so much noise 
> on here we can't hear ourselves think, and since everyone who had 
> anything to say on the matter already did so the first time(s) there 
> won't even be any point to it.
> 
> - Steph

If I could vote:
 > 1) goto and break label
-1
 > 2) goto only (like C)
-0.5
 > 3) break label only (like Java)
0
 > 4) nothing
0.5

Please consider "break" and "continue" same in my vote
4) is positive as acting against 1) and 2)
Regards
-- 
toggg