Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22243
Return-Path: <nlopess@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 97416 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Mar 2006 10:40:54 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 97401 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 10:40:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 10:40:54 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.55.154.24 relay4.ptmail.sapo.pt Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from ([212.55.154.24:48715] helo=sapo.pt)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id 88/FF-27106-5B4BE044 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:40:53 -0500
Received: (qmail 21693 invoked by uid 0); 8 Mar 2006 10:40:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sapo.pt) (10.134.35.157)
	by relay4 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 10:40:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 3565 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 10:40:47 -0000
X-AntiVirus: PTMail-AV 0.3.88
X-Virus-Status: Clean (0.28843 seconds)
Received: from unknown (HELO pc07653) (nunoplopes@sapo.pt@[81.193.154.178])
	(envelope-sender <nlopess@php.net>)
	by mta7 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; 8 Mar 2006 10:40:46 -0000
Message-ID: <00c101c6429c$c243c330$0100a8c0@pc07653>
To: <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <000001c641c9$80dbfad0$6e02a8c0@thinkpad> <0bcc01c641f5$a7da1c80$6402a8c0@foxbox> <440E8074.4090903@bitflux.ch>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:40:43 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="Windows-1252";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL
From: nlopess@php.net ("Nuno Lopes")

> On 7.3.2006 15:44 Uhr, Steph Fox wrote:
>>> 1) goto and break label
>>> 2) goto only (like C)
>>> 3) break label only (like Java)
>>> 4) nothing
> 
>   Sorry for the noise. I was told to vote.
> 
> Meaning, I don't care, never had a use for GOTO, but if the caring 
> majority thinks, it's needed, why not :)
> 
> chregu

same here.

1) -1
2) 0.5
3) -1
4) 0

Nuno