Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22211 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80652 invoked by uid 1010); 7 Mar 2006 17:02:33 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80637 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2006 17:02:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2006 17:02:33 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.240.252.15 unknown Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([66.240.252.15:37480] helo=mail.ft11.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id DE/5C-22029-8ACBD044 for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:02:32 -0500 Received: (qmail 8987 invoked by uid 510); 7 Mar 2006 09:02:30 -0800 Received: from 69.167.181.84 by fc425215.aspadmin.net (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1209. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(69.167.181.84):SA:0(0.2/5.0):. Processed in 1.269739 secs); 07 Mar 2006 17:02:30 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: mlively@ft11.com via fc425215.aspadmin.net X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(69.167.181.84):SA:0(0.2/5.0):. Processed in 1.269739 secs Process 8980) Received: from couerdalene-cuda2-69-167-181-84.losaca.adelphia.net (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (mlively@ft11.net@69.167.181.84) by mail.ft11.net with SMTP; 7 Mar 2006 09:02:28 -0800 Reply-To: mlively@ft11.com To: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <000001c641c9$80dbfad0$6e02a8c0@thinkpad> References: <000001c641c9$80dbfad0$6e02a8c0@thinkpad> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FT11 Interactive Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:02:29 -0800 Message-ID: <1141750949.3361.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL From: mlively@ft11.com (Mike Lively) On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 12:28 +0300, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > Hi, > > Because of some confused people I reverted "break label" patch and post it > for discussion once again together with GOTO patch. > > Please reviw and vote. > > 1) goto and break label > 2) goto only (like C) > 3) break label only (like Java) > 4) nothing > > My vote: (1) +0.5, (4) +0.5 > > Thanks. Dmitry. > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php 1) +0 2) +1 3) -1 4) -1 I personally think labelled breaks are more fluff than anything. Like Greg I just haven't seen any examples of trying to break out of more than 3 loops in live code and I only recall seeing that once.