Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22204
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <440DA6B0.7000107@emini.dk>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:28:48 +0100
Organization: Emini A/S
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>
Cc: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>, internals@lists.php.net
References: <000001c641c9$80dbfad0$6e02a8c0@thinkpad> <7.0.1.0.2.20060307071312.04e81c08@zend.com>
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060307071312.04e81c08@zend.com>
OpenPGP: id=157D0FA8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL
From: edink@emini.dk (Edin Kadribasic)

Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I'm with Rasmus on the break label stuff. Although it's not confusing to
> me, I got convinced quickly that it'll be confusing to the wider
> audience. So big -1 from me for (2) & (1).

From your comment bellow I figure you're for option 2, right?

Edin


> I think we should either stick with nothing or go to a full goto
> (without jumping into scopes of course). Only forward gotos would go
> against one of the main initial motivations for discussing this which
> was state machines.
> 
> I suggest we apply this and allow people to play around with it/test it....
> 
> Btw, how about naming it "jump" and not "goto"? :)
> Andi
> 
> At 01:28 AM 3/7/2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Because of some confused people I reverted "break label" patch and
>> post it
>> for discussion once again together with GOTO patch.
>>
>> Please reviw and vote.
>>
>> 1) goto and break label
>> 2) goto only (like C)
>> 3) break label only (like Java)
>> 4) nothing
>>
>> My vote: (1) +0.5, (4) +0.5
>>
>> Thanks. Dmitry.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
>