Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22105 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27337 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Mar 2006 00:38:37 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27322 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2006 00:38:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2006 00:38:37 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.249.92.205 uproxy.gmail.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([66.249.92.205:31138] helo=uproxy.gmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id D8/99-35203-C81E8044 for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 19:38:37 -0500 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a2so377811ugf for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 16:38:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TpU2l2wq4/npE73mHFAtwEoxjopF+zap36tJw3BZo+spEbBiFOKPMcQxRuZEsPVHSYmKEy791W+mCNldgJG3G6AQ7J7tx2kJ+4q0nQgSW1dxYpiENut6EbriTZ5/EhBpTGAhUUesDEHLQYroOTFZcTKZaRY5SzwD8SdGn/oil48= Received: by 10.66.243.20 with SMTP id q20mr1386155ugh; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 16:38:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.26.18 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:38:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 01:38:32 +0100 To: "Andi Gutmans" Cc: "Johannes Schlueter" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060303143552.02c06780@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200603032330.00973.johannes@php.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20060303143552.02c06780@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [patch] Separating ZEND_METHOD and ZEND_FUNCTION From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) On 3/3/06, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Makes sense to me. For me too, I was requesting that on IRC and Johannes wrote the patch, thanks :-) A perfect example of this need is the current zip extension, I have both a zip_open function and a zip::open method, acting differently. Many extensions have to (re)define themselves these macros, as I did. --Pierre