Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21971 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93166 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Feb 2006 10:57:57 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93151 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2006 10:57:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Feb 2006 10:57:57 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:59551] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id D2/8C-45151-532FAF34 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:57:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1LAvsIw006316; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:57:54 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1LAvqVs006303; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:57:52 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:57:41 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Steph Fox cc: Lukas Smith , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <14ac01c636d5$37d77980$6402a8c0@foxbox> Message-ID: References: <045701c634af$050b5df0$6402a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218112459.03e617c0@zend.com><04e401c634db$69a82ff0$6402a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218144712.03e32c18@zend.com><4e89b4260602191509g549541d9t4d8b82008cfc380a@mail.gmail.com><43F986A0.1020103@php.net> <00.FB.45151.A5BA9F34@pb1.pair.com> <14ac01c636d5$37d77980$6402a8c0@foxbox> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] True labelled breaks From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Steph Fox wrote: > > > Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > > > > Wez Furlong wrote: > > > > > I think not many people use it because it's difficult to use. > > > > > Having real labels might change that. > > > > > Personally, I'd prefer real goto, as I've stated in the past. > > > > > Just for the record again, I'm +1 for goto, and +0.5 for labelled > > > > > breaks only if we've totally given up on goto. > > > > > > > > FULLACK > > > > > > +1 > > > > Same here, +1 on full goto. And if not then the PDM result. Labelled > > breaks are inadequate IMO. > > One more time: labelled breaks weren't offered as an _alternative_ to goto. > Why are you bringing this to the forum now? I am replying to the thread? Is that an offensive or something? Derick