Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87805 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Feb 2006 10:54:24 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87790 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2006 10:54:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Feb 2006 10:54:24 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.38.9.232 gw2.emini.dk Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([192.38.9.232:16443] helo=gw2.emini.dk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 0E/7B-45151-F51FAF34 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:54:23 -0500 Received: from foxbox (IGLD-84-228-50-112.inter.net.il [84.228.50.112]) by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4666AA4231; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:54:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <14ac01c636d5$37d77980$6402a8c0@foxbox> Reply-To: "Steph Fox" To: "Derick Rethans" , "Lukas Smith" Cc: References: <045701c634af$050b5df0$6402a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218112459.03e617c0@zend.com><04e401c634db$69a82ff0$6402a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218144712.03e32c18@zend.com><4e89b4260602191509g549541d9t4d8b82008cfc380a@mail.gmail.com><43F986A0.1020103@php.net> <00.FB.45151.A5BA9F34@pb1.pair.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:54:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] True labelled breaks From: steph@zend.com ("Steph Fox") >> Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: >> > Wez Furlong wrote: >> > > I think not many people use it because it's difficult to use. >> > > Having real labels might change that. >> > > Personally, I'd prefer real goto, as I've stated in the past. >> > > Just for the record again, I'm +1 for goto, and +0.5 for labelled >> > > breaks only if we've totally given up on goto. >> > >> > FULLACK >> >> +1 > > Same here, +1 on full goto. And if not then the PDM result. Labelled > breaks are inadequate IMO. One more time: labelled breaks weren't offered as an _alternative_ to goto. Why are you bringing this to the forum now? - Steph