Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21969 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86351 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Feb 2006 10:50:40 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86335 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2006 10:50:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Feb 2006 10:50:40 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:53810] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 04/4B-45151-E70FAF34 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:50:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1LAoadu004618; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:50:36 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1LAoWPD004574; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:50:32 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:50:21 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Lukas Smith cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <00.FB.45151.A5BA9F34@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: References: <045701c634af$050b5df0$6402a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218112459.03e617c0@zend.com> <04e401c634db$69a82ff0$6402a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218144712.03e32c18@zend.com> <4e89b4260602191509g549541d9t4d8b82008cfc380a@mail.gmail.com> <43F986A0.1020103@php.net> <00.FB.45151.A5BA9F34@pb1.pair.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] True labelled breaks From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Lukas Smith wrote: > Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > > Wez Furlong wrote: > > > I think not many people use it because it's difficult to use. > > > Having real labels might change that. > > > Personally, I'd prefer real goto, as I've stated in the past. > > > Just for the record again, I'm +1 for goto, and +0.5 for labelled > > > breaks only if we've totally given up on goto. > > > > FULLACK > > +1 Same here, +1 on full goto. And if not then the PDM result. Labelled breaks are inadequate IMO. Derick