Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21966 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26050 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Feb 2006 21:29:19 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26035 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2006 21:29:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2006 21:29:19 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.74.107.235:18898] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id A5/7C-45151-DA43AF34 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:29:18 -0500 Received: (qmail 7990 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2006 21:29:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ANDI-NOTEBOOK.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2006 21:29:13 -0000 Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20060220132853.073d04d8@zend.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:29:03 -0800 To: Marcus Boerger Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <206533750.20060220221813@marcus-boerger.de> References: <1692386645.20060219115704@marcus-boerger.de> <7.0.1.0.2.20060220122342.044187f8@zend.com> <206533750.20060220221813@marcus-boerger.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Deprecation of functions From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) You clearly didn't understand what I was trying to say... At 01:18 PM 2/20/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote: >Hello Andi, > > > sorry i fixed your issues, discussed with some ppl online and you were >clearly working on php at the same time. Further more i am the only one >here regularly showing patches before committing. I guess i should just >change to commit without taking anymore care. And yes i did it on purpose. >I managed to fix my router again and wasn't sure it would continue to >work. And btw, for my all the work i do on php happens in free time - >sorry for that > >Monday, February 20, 2006, 9:31:02 PM, you wrote: > > > Just for the record I've been spending quite a bit of time, trying to > > see how we can lower the amount of branches within our opcodes. > > Although one if() doesn't make a big difference on its own, the large > > number of branches we have do make a difference. So before you say > > it's just an integer comparison or 0.1%, there is actually much more > > to it. Also, the more branches we will have over time, the harder > to optimize. > > > I wasn't against the deprecated feature but just stated that > > implementation wise, adding another branch should be thought about > > again. There are other ways of adding deprecated to functions, which > > would only slow down the deprecated functions and not all functions. > > > That said, as the abstract patch truly solves a problem, and adding > > the deprecated one on top of that isn't any slower, I don't mind the patch. > > > Marcus, as usual you send a patch for comment on the weekend, and > > commit before you give fair amount of time for review. Monday is a > > holiday here in the US, and generally speaking, giving 2-3 days is > > the right thing to do. I've asked you numerous time and I suggest you > > respect it in future (although I realize it was probably done on purpose). > > > Andi > > > At 02:57 AM 2/19/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote: > >>Hello internals, > >> > >> i just made up a tiny patch that allows us to deprecate functions. The > >>background is that in the past we changed to issue E_STRICT or E_NOTICE > >>for stuff we are going to change in later versions. This is right now not > >>easily possible when we change to replace a functions name. The usual way > >>to add the new name is to rename the function and add an alias with the old > >>name but for the deprecation message we would need to have the function > >>implementation twice so that one can issue the message. The patch now > >>allows us to specify a function flag on the alias. > >> > >>I checked an early version of the patch with Andi and he didn't like the > >>introduction of another if(). For the explicit calling handler i see no > >>problem in adding it since it is just an integer comparision which makes > >>out less than 0.1% of the zend_call_function() for the function-call > >>opcode i hid the check behind the abstract check. So there is no new > >>penalty. And actually i think the abstract check is neccessary for the > >>the other part also. So the patch found an error and doesn't come with any > >>additional penalty at all. > >> > >>Patch is available for both 5.1 and HEAD here: > >>http://php.net/~helly/php/ext/ze2/ze2-deprecated-20060219-5_1.diff.txt > >>http://php.net/~helly/php/ext/ze2/ze2-deprecated-20060219-HEAD.diff.txt > >> > >>Anyone against? > >> > >>Best regards, > >> Marcus > >> > >>-- > >>PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > >>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > >Best regards, > Marcus