Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21948 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79151 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Feb 2006 07:23:04 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79136 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2006 07:23:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2006 07:23:04 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:54235] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 4F/53-45151-55E69F34 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:23:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1K7MxcV026233; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:22:59 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1K7Muh9026227; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:22:57 +0100 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:22:49 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Andi Gutmans cc: Steph Fox , internals In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060218161117.02a16628@zend.com> Message-ID: References: <045701c634af$050b5df0$6402a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218112459.03e617c0@zend.com> <04e401c634db$69a82ff0$6402a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218144712.03e32c18@zend.com> <051f01c634de$45c12df0$6402a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218145604.03e678a8@zend.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218161117.02a16628@zend.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] True labelled breaks From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote: > As I said, the syntax is quite elegant and the patch isn't too bad either. > However, I do suggest we only add it if people are really convinced that it'll > be used. I will use it. << that good enough? :) But seriously, I have quite a few cases where I would use it if it was available. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org