Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21644 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38804 invoked by uid 1010); 23 Jan 2006 08:26:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38788 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2006 08:26:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jan 2006 08:26:03 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.91.229.2 main.gmane.org Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.91.229.2:45392] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 5C/81-06819-91394D34 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:26:02 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F0x1L-0005Q2-H3 for internals@lists.php.net; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:25:51 +0100 Received: from p50886884.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.136.104.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:25:51 +0100 Received: from sb by p50886884.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:25:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:25:29 +0100 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <1179437188.20060122193218@marcus-boerger.de> <7.0.0.16.2.20060122185859.02b91f38@zend.com> <43D48EEB.1090808@php.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p50886884.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <43D48EEB.1090808@php.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Static vs. non static From: sb@sebastian-bergmann.de (Sebastian Bergmann) Lukas Smith schrieb: > If I get Marcus proposal properly he would then allow changing things > from: > parent::method(); > > to > > parent->method(); If that is the case, then it would be consistent to allow this->method() this->attribute parent->attribute too, no? (Note that I am not advocating the above, I am just being curious about consistency issues.) -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69