Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21636 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90620 invoked by uid 1010); 22 Jan 2006 23:02:20 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90598 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2006 23:02:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jan 2006 23:02:20 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 lerdorf.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([204.11.219.139:49045] helo=colo.lerdorf.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id F0/41-06819-7FE04D34 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 18:02:17 -0500 Received: from colo.lerdorf.com (colo [127.0.0.1]) by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0MN236f032669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:02:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (rasmus@localhost) by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) with ESMTP id k0MN22a6032665; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:02:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: colo.lerdorf.com: rasmus owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:02:02 -0800 (PST) X-X-Sender: rasmus@colo To: Derick Rethans cc: Andi Gutmans , Jani Taskinen , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <43D13AAE.1030409@lerdorf.com> <7.0.0.16.2.20060120134701.04186f60@zend.com> <7.0.0.16.2.20060120160835.040c9f20@zend.com> <7.0.0.16.2.20060120165840.041fbf10@zend.com> <43D19937.6050201@lerdorf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1247/Sat Jan 21 02:24:51 2006 on colo X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] JSON inclusion in core From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> I am all for the filter extension as well obviously, but I agree there is a >> bit of cleanup needed and I have a bunch of things I'd like to see in it, but >> none of them necessarily block adding it. > > What would you like to add? A useful tag filter that understands attributes as well so you can lock down exactly which tags with which attributes you wish to allow through. It's a non-trivial addition. -Rasmus