Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21538 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54709 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Jan 2006 11:17:58 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54693 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2006 11:17:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Jan 2006 11:17:58 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:43512] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 33/BC-13436-56F2AC34 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:17:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0FBHoc0012780; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:17:50 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0FBHmAw012773; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:17:49 +0100 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:17:45 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Rasmus Lerdorf cc: Aidan Lister , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <43C9FF01.1060008@lerdorf.com> Message-ID: References: <11370812947200000@9866357972520000.9866341568840000> <43C688AE.80403@php.net> <43C69B2A.8000802@php.net> <21.B4.29075.F75A6C34@pb1.pair.com> <54.A8.13436.BE6F9C34@pb1.pair.com> <43C9FF01.1060008@lerdorf.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Named arguments revisited From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Aidan Lister wrote: > > Are the PHP group prepared to accept and implement a named parameters patch? > > As far as I am concerned it would depend on the patch. If you can come up > with a way to do it with requiring rewriting all 4000+ functions out there, go ^^^^ I think you meant without? Derick