Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21508 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49929 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Jan 2006 11:37:36 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49914 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 11:37:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 11:37:36 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.74.107.235:49129] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 26/4B-25674-FF097C34 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:37:36 -0500 Received: (qmail 1553 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 11:37:31 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 11:37:31 -0000 Message-ID: <43C790F6.20609@zend.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:37:26 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ron Korving CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <43C67431.9090003@prohost.org><3A366ACB-20D4-42C7-BBAE-46F643E3A91F@intuitivefuture.com><878581203.20060112153625@ionzoft.com> <7.0.0.16.2.20060112154219.029d06c8@zend.com><43C75FEE.7040908@php.net> <6C.F4.25674.EFD67C34@pb1.pair.com> <43C786E5.1020400@mysql.com> <21.7A.25674.84E87C34@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <21.7A.25674.84E87C34@pb1.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Named arguments revisited From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 13.01.2006 14:25, Ron Korving wrote: > That's a good point. But for PHP6, wouldn't everything have to be revised > anyway? Another option is to make named parameter support optional per > function. If a user calls a function with named parameters which the > function doesn't support, the engine can trigger an error. This way internal > functions and extensions can be upgraded with named parameter support as > time goes on. What a horror. -1000000000 billions. P.S. Or are you kidding? -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal