Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:2149 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21474 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 07:10:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tyholt.uninett.no) (158.38.60.10) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 07:10:17 -0000 Received: from sverresborg.uninett.no (sverresborg.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:e000:0:290:27ff:fe50:6bfa]) by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h547AGUB010076; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:10:16 +0200 Received: (from venaas@localhost) by sverresborg.uninett.no (8.11.6/8.11.2) id h547AGf08804; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:10:16 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: sverresborg.uninett.no: venaas set sender to Stig.Venaas@uninett.no using -f Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:10:15 +0200 To: Nathaniel David Gallaher , internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <20030604091015.A8798@sverresborg.uninett.no> References: <20030604065940.GA16893@csh.rit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030604065940.GA16893@csh.rit.edu>; from jon@php.net on Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:59:41AM -0400 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] LDAP bind option From: Stig.Venaas@uninett.no (Stig Venaas) On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:59:41AM -0400, Jon Parise wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 06:26:43PM -0400, Nathaniel David Gallaher wrote: > > > Currently the call to ldap_bind only supports the method LDAP_AUTH_SIMPLE > > (as it is hardcoded in the php function definition). Can we put the > > method parameter (as see in the call to ldap_bind_s) back into the PHP > > function? I have an application that obtains x509 certs (securely) and I > > want to use them to bind to the LDAP server. > > I'll try and have a look at this soon. I just need to find the time > to get my local LDAP server up and running again for testing. There are also things like SASL that should be supported. That should perhaps be done with a separate bind function though. It's great if you look into this, I have sort of had it on my todo list for a couple of years... Stig