Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21322 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16013 invoked by uid 1010); 22 Dec 2005 15:20:20 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15998 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2005 15:20:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Dec 2005 15:20:20 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.184.199 wproxy.gmail.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([64.233.184.199:39764] helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id FA/88-45033-434CAA34 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:20:20 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i24so376335wra for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:20:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ssRn7Y++LaZfmc7GrFLo34QM7ejq5+u3xHIwHdXBICzgHHVdWbC2Q6v0zkYeeyKJjo97fK4e9PwHyn0HbeY4rrEFfetAVB+xEhcUV236P3c5kdQpPGIYiEUpreMNe7ZmSeQre9+LVHc5+4Mb68hp1kRLRIZy8U3aPtpOD4+aMO0= Received: by 10.54.115.15 with SMTP id n15mr2310457wrc; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:20:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.77.20 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:20:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4e89b4260512220720m5eed119aj5b4cbb6a7c64213e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:20:16 -0500 To: Marian Kostadinov Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Question about PDO::exec From: kingwez@gmail.com (Wez Furlong) No. Where did you read that? --Wez. On 12/22/05, Marian Kostadinov wrote: > I have read somewhere something about PDO::exec that it was going to be > removed from PDO. Is it true or not? > >