Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21033 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92456 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Dec 2005 17:59:37 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92441 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2005 17:59:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Dec 2005 17:59:36 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([81.169.182.136:58092] helo=strato.aixcept.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 56/A2-14828-78E23934 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:59:35 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dslb-084-063-007-254.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.7.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAA5610287; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:06:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:01:45 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <897343532.20051204190145@marcus-boerger.de> To: Pierre Cc: internals@lists.php.net, Marcus Boerger In-Reply-To: <20051201205845.672cfc60@localhost.localdomain> References: <438E77BA.8060509@prohost.org> <438EBB97.9050809@lerdorf.com> <438F1E43.4040000@prohost.org> <508325769.20051201205232@marcus-boerger.de> <20051201205845.672cfc60@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1.2 Release Plan From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Pierre, Thursday, December 1, 2005, 8:58:45 PM, you wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:52:32 +0100 > helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) wrote: >> Hello Ilia, >> >> i prefer only allowing PHP License in 'stock PHP'. > The question was not what "we" prefer but what is allowed or not, and > why. Once again, I am not stupid. > To be a little more precised, I see no reason to not allow BSD-like or > other similar license for the extensions. For example the bundled GD is > not under the PHP License, or is it already not considered as part of > the extension? What difference does that make? I already explained that in private. As long as the core extensions go with the PHP License we can change the license if we decide necessary. If something is done in another license then it is depending on that license whether a change is allowed. Best regards, Marcus