Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:21010 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32849 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Dec 2005 15:54:39 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32834 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2005 15:54:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Dec 2005 15:54:39 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.225.34.5 fw01.axit.nl Received: from ([195.225.34.5:2349] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id E0/E0-14828-F3E60934 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:54:39 -0500 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net References: <3F.25.11378.CEA42834@pb1.pair.com><018d01c5eeec$23949600$5c8be5a9@ohr.berkeley.edu><497935ba0511211511l5867410dk577deb60b998a069@mail.gmail.com><497935ba0511211512k4c8e1cb4r89cf1ffcd4ab7829@mail.gmail.com><438254E6.2050903@prohost.org><497935ba0511211609n675a3c3yf03cb5e5e97bb5bf@mail.gmail.com><4382BDA2.4050806@php.net><497935ba0511220024l492112f7nfe2c05d27d65e1a5@mail.gmail.com><497935ba0511220024j4a189b94r667945241f1811f8@mail.gmail.com><497935ba0511220159y14dc36cra39e28d7d617a03b@mail.gmail.com><13067.64.241.37.140.1132675931.squirrel@www.quo.org><21.D1.11378.F1096834@pb1.pair.com> <00b501c5f17d$c1259980$7d051fac@stumpy><43905052.1070208@mjec.net> <84.B8.14828.0B550934@pb1.pair.com> <1133535743.10437.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:54:19 +0100 Lines: 47 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Posted-By: 195.225.34.5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Syntax in PHP 6 From: r.korving@xit.nl ("Ron Korving") It looks odd because (afaik) most of these functions were born in Unix and were nice and short. Because of all the abbreviations they're not very suitable for studlycaps. Unlike the usage of underscores, the usage of studlycaps is totally optional anyway, since function names are case insensitive. Because of this, the usage of studlycaps should be limited to PHP-documentation anyway. So maybe we should remove underscores altogether and leave it to the user if they want to use studlycaps? Just an idea, it's not like there has been a good system in the past. We're trying to improve here. Maybe it's not perfect (yet?), but at least, imho, it's an improvement. - Ron ""Matthew C. Kavanagh"" schreef in bericht news:1133535743.10437.23.camel@localhost.localdomain... > On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 15:09 +0100, Ron Korving wrote: >> strPos() >> arrayMerge() >> isInt() >> imageCreateFromString() > > fEof() or fEOF()? > addCSlashes()? > strIReplace()? > strCSpn()? > stripCSlashes()? > strIPos()? > strIStr()? > strNCaseCmp()? > strNCmp()? > strPBrk()? > strRChr()? > strRIPos()? (That one's my favourite). > strRPos()? > uCFirst()? > uCWords()? > vFPrintF()? > vSPrintF()? > > Looks wonderful. And that's just the strings. ;)