Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20978 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33698 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Dec 2005 19:57:57 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33682 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2005 19:57:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Dec 2005 19:57:57 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 84.56.45.67 dslb-084-056-045-067.pools.arcor-ip.net Received: from ([84.56.45.67:3724] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 7E/E7-14828-4C55F834 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:57:57 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net,Marcus Boerger Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:58:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20051201205845.672cfc60@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <508325769.20051201205232@marcus-boerger.de> References: <438E77BA.8060509@prohost.org> <438EBB97.9050809@lerdorf.com> <438F1E43.4040000@prohost.org> <508325769.20051201205232@marcus-boerger.de> Reply-To: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Newsreader: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.14 (GTK+ 2.8.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 84.56.45.67 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1.2 Release Plan From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:52:32 +0100 helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) wrote: > Hello Ilia, > > i prefer only allowing PHP License in 'stock PHP'. The question was not what "we" prefer but what is allowed or not, and why. To be a little more precised, I see no reason to not allow BSD-like or other similar license for the extensions. For example the bundled GD is not under the PHP License, or is it already not considered as part of the extension? What difference does that make? --Pierre