Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20977 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28812 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Dec 2005 19:50:30 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28797 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2005 19:50:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Dec 2005 19:50:30 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([81.169.182.136:45954] helo=strato.aixcept.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id F4/47-14828-5045F834 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:50:30 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dslb-084-063-006-032.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.6.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE7135C396; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:57:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:52:32 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <508325769.20051201205232@marcus-boerger.de> To: Ilia Alshanetsky Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf , Jani Taskinen , In-Reply-To: <438F1E43.4040000@prohost.org> References: <438E77BA.8060509@prohost.org> <438EBB97.9050809@lerdorf.com> <438F1E43.4040000@prohost.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1.2 Release Plan From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Ilia, i prefer only allowing PHP License in 'stock PHP'. marcus Thursday, December 1, 2005, 5:01:07 PM, you wrote: > Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> One of the reasons is that this would be the first extension we bundle >> which isn't under the PHP license. > Not a question about xmlwriter specifically, but licensing policy in > general. Does your comment imply that only and only extension released > under the PHP license are allowed into the "stock" PHP distribution? Or > would we allow compatible licenses like BSD, Freeware (ala SQLite lib) > , etc... in as well? It may be important to outline this once so that > extension writers who put their stuff into PECL and hope for eventual > inclusion into core can pick the proper license. > Ilia Best regards, Marcus