Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20893
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:50:49 +0200 (IST)
To: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>
cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <2B.E1.14828.4130D834@pb1.pair.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0511301147150.6488@shire.zend.office>
References: <2B.E1.14828.4130D834@pb1.pair.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Labeled Break (nothing at all whatsoever to do with
	GOTO)
From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

SG>>Actual labeled breaks.  Not the break+jump that was proposed earlier in the

I think the idea is OK, though I don't like a syntax. There is a standard 
for/while syntax which is used by a lot of procedural languages, and I see 
no reason to break it. I see nothing wrong with using FOO: for label.

SG>>* Labels can be repeated by siblings.  I'm not married to this, and it

I don't think this is really needed, though it's doable and has some logic 
in it (after all, once the labelled block ends, the label is not longer 
existing).

SG>>* Labeled breaks also apply to continue;  For example:

yes, I think it's a good way to do it.

-- 
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
stas@zend.com  http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115