Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20831 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28089 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Nov 2005 15:28:20 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28071 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2005 15:28:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Nov 2005 15:28:20 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.190.142.222 64-190-142-222.client.cypresscom.net Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from ([64.190.142.222:20390] helo=64-190-142-222.client.cypresscom.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 66/AD-14828-3EE6C834 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:08:19 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:08:15 -0600 Message-ID: <17CE68B7A7E8CD4EBB95665AFB5ABB03055340@stream0.sisterprize0.sister.tv> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Remove me! Thread-Index: AcX04lcyurhwxfapSD6wmrPq2UDrpgAFFikw To: "Lukas Smith" , "Stanislav Malyshev" Cc: "PHP Developers Mailing List" Subject: Remove me! From: oalpert@sister.tv ("Israel Alpert") Can somebody help me stop the flood of income e-mails from PHP? I've signed to the newsletter and, during the last two month, made many attempts to "unsubscribe" - none works and I am getting 100's of e-mails from you. Please take me off the mailing list! -----Original Message----- From: Lukas Smith [mailto:lsmith@php.net]=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 6:14 AM To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Labeled Breaks (not the G-word) Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > LS>>How is that different from "goto"? >=20 > I start to suspect you just skip what I am writing. Didn't I explain=20 > that > exception does not allow to jump to random points and goto does?=20 You are argue on technical/internals terms. I agrue that what is=20 "defined" and "clear" is determined by the amount of code that can be=20 touched and how easily you can find the relevant points in your code. > LS>>And if you can jump through 80% if your code via an exception=20 > LS>>while you unwind the stack it might be ordered but you tell me=20 > LS>>that you know whats going on. For all intends and purposes it will > LS>>be just as random, with the >=20 > Precentage of code that lies between throw point and catch point has > nothing to do with anything. The structure of the code - that you=20 > always know which block encloses the code with exception potential and which code=20 > would handle the exception if it arises - has everything to do with it. See above. The percentage and the searchability are the things that=20 matter for the real world. *sigh* .. its so hard to stop argueing in circles ;-) regards, Lukas --=20 PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php