Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20774
Return-Path: <r.korving@xit.nl>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 93627 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Nov 2005 20:27:51 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 93612 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2005 20:27:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Nov 2005 20:27:51 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.68.134.212 c514486d4.cable.wanadoo.nl  
Received: from ([81.68.134.212:12395] helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id B2/3F-21657-6486B834 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:27:50 -0500
Message-ID: <B2.3F.21657.6486B834@pb1.pair.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0511221852340.31280@localhost><1607285441.20051127115816@marcus-boerger.de><20051127212028.GA12580@panix.com> <200511272232.53858.johannes@php.net><1133127650.9056.48.camel@localhost.localdomain><00bc01c5f3a5$2155c630$7d051fac@stumpy> <438AC658.6010405@gmail.com> <793837231.20051128202942@marcus-boerger.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:15:47 +0100
Lines: 56
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Posted-By: 81.68.134.212
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] <?xml tags (was PDM Meeting Notes)
From: r.korving@xit.nl ("Ron Korving")

me too, i've asked for this before but i remember it being laughed away...

ron


"Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net> wrote in message
news:793837231.20051128202942@marcus-boerger.de...
> Hello Bastian,
>
>   id like to see '<?php=' too.
>
> marcus
>
> Monday, November 28, 2005, 9:56:56 AM, you wrote:
>
> > What concerns me most is that <?php= does not work, regardless if short
> > tags will be disabled or not in php6. I currently use <%= to counter
> > this, but I am most certainly *not* happy with it.
>
> > So a clean <?php= solution would be ideal, so I wouldn't have to care
> > about xml/xsl files parsed and neither about my templates growing too
> > large because of php overhead.
>
> > Sara Golemon wrote:
> >>> I recall this being discussed before, but not what came of it: is
there
> >>> a problem with just ignoring <?foo where foo is anything other than
php
> >>> or =? <?foo or <?bar or <?whatever is a parse error anyway so I very
> >>> much doubt there's any BC break. Unless someone's program relies on
> >>> parse errors.
> >>>
> >> The problem there becomes legacy support for:
> >>
> >> <?foo();?>
> >>
> >> And before you say "just watch for parens" there's also:
> >>
> >> <?foo::bar();?>
> >>
> >> and a much more insiduous example:
> >>
> >> <?die ?>
> >>
> >> no semicolon, no parens, no paamayim nekudotayim, nothing but a
> >> perfectly valid looking PI tag.
> >>
> >> -Sara
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>  Marcus