Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20634 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18384 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Nov 2005 03:32:43 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18368 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2005 03:32:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Nov 2005 03:32:43 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 68.215.62.134 adsl-215-62-134.mia.bellsouth.net Received: from ([68.215.62.134:7795] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id BA/21-56276-BD829834 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:32:43 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net,Jessie Hernandez Message-ID: <438928D7.3030207@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:32:39 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Oliver_Gr=E4tz?= References: <20.BA.56276.A1BC8834@pb1.pair.com> <31.BC.56276.1C519834@pb1.pair.com> <4389182E.6080404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4389182E.6080404@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 68.215.62.134 Subject: Re: namespace separator ideas From: jrhernandez05@gmail.com (Jessie Hernandez) Sorry, did not notice you put a special meaning to +2, +1, etc. You can put a +2 for me for ":" and a +1 for ":::". Anyways, I'm tired of discussing this. I'm going to stick to ::: for now, and if constants are not wanted, I'll then go with ":". I have to work on some minor details of the patch, which are more important than this (I put the namespace separator in a #define, so it can easily be changed in the future). Regards, Jessie Jessie Hernandez wrote: > Great work, Oliver! I personally also add a +1 for ":", with the > whitespace restriction in the ternary operator (or just removing > namespace constants). > > I would also add another restriction: you cannot more than one point > for/against (so no +2's or -2's, etc.). It just doesn't make sense (I > might as well do +4000000 for whatever I want :-) ). > > > Regards, > > Jessie >