Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20628 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94936 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Nov 2005 02:51:11 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94920 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2005 02:51:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Nov 2005 02:51:11 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.149.123.177 mail.aaaa.ws Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([83.149.123.177:35176] helo=mail.aaaa.ws) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 78/CE-56276-E1F19834 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:51:11 -0500 Received: from cpc2-sout5-5-0-cust53.sot3.cable.ntl.com ([81.110.110.53] helo=[192.168.1.103]) by mail.aaaa.ws with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1EgCd7-0003hq-5E; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 03:51:05 +0100 To: Nicolas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=E9rard?= Nault Cc: Oliver =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4tz?= , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <30bd80240511261841l6ad7e812v2d600017b24dc55d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20.BA.56276.A1BC8834@pb1.pair.com> <31.BC.56276.1C519834@pb1.pair.com> <4389182E.6080404@gmail.com> <4E.4D.56276.6BB19834@pb1.pair.com> <30bd80240511261841l6ad7e812v2d600017b24dc55d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 02:51:06 +0000 Message-ID: <1133059866.9056.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: namespace separator ideas From: matthew@teh.ath.cx ("Matthew C. Kavanagh") On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 21:41 -0500, Nicolas B=C3=A9rard Nault wrote: > +2 to <-, which, in my humble opinion, is more logic than anything else t= hat > was proposed (as mentionned earlier, it creates a sort of "hierachy"). Hmm, is it really necessary to vote for separators which aren't remotely technically possible and have been pointed out as such? ;)