Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20597 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90771 invoked by uid 1010); 26 Nov 2005 22:23:20 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90756 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2005 22:23:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Nov 2005 22:23:20 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.237.132.12 wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.237.132.12:52786] helo=wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 66/B2-56276-850E8834 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:23:20 -0500 Received: by wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.43 using esmtpa from dslb-084-057-003-238.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.57.3.238] helo=[192.168.0.100]) id 1Eg8Rw-0004Lw-48; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 23:23:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1133043371.9056.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20.BA.56276.A1BC8834@pb1.pair.com> <4388CE54.6060606@gmail.com> <1133043371.9056.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-ID: <21326AD4-665E-45E2-90DC-266FFEBFF2E0@bitxtender.com> Cc: Stanislav Malyshev , internals@lists.php.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 23:23:15 +0100 To: Matthew C. Kavanagh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: namespace separator ideas From: dz@bitxtender.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?=) -> is crap because it is used for accessing object methods and properties. Come on, guys. It is not that difficult. Think before you write. - David Am 26.11.2005 um 23:16 schrieb Matthew C. Kavanagh: > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 00:06 +0200, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> I wonder what "PHP feel" is in bunch of special symbols with meaning >> entirely obscure to non-initiated... Why not {@ or <* then? They >> are nice >> ASCII art too. And there are so many combinations of two special >> symbols, >> let's find a meaning for all of them. Or at least for as many as >> we can. > > Great, everyone loves sarcasm, but you're describing exactly the > opposite of what's going on in this thread. There is a perceived need > for this functionality and you could argue for or against the > functionality instead. There's plenty of two character tokens in PHP > already and people aren't calling it "PerlHP" yet. > > The -> suggestion if practicable seems the most intuitively correct to > me. > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >