Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20576 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4982 invoked by uid 1010); 26 Nov 2005 20:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4967 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2005 20:10:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Nov 2005 20:10:11 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 68.215.62.134 adsl-215-62-134.mia.bellsouth.net Received: from ([68.215.62.134:28427] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 80/36-56276-221C8834 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:10:11 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net,Jessie Hernandez Message-ID: <4388C11D.2000708@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:10:05 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Oliver_Gr=E4tz?= References: <7.0.0.16.2.20051124161240.0573e640@zend.com> <90.0E.56276.6D207834@pb1.pair.com> <200511251419.56809.pookey@pookey.co.uk> <57.B8.56276.65B27834@pb1.pair.com> <73998811.20051125204046@marcus-boerger.de> <438782C6.80008@gmail.com> <43878626.5060300@lerdorf.com> <512771162.20051125225926@marcus-boerger.de> <6B.D6.56276.154E7834@pb1.pair.com> <1638013035.20051126122138@marcus-boerger.de> <43888778.2050805@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43888778.2050805@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 68.215.62.134 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps out there) From: jrhernandez05@gmail.com (Jessie Hernandez) All, What would you say if I managed to solve this problem, but that the solution entailed changing the namespace separator to ":::"? The code below works fine locally. Is ":::" unacceptable? Personally, I think anything is better than using "\", and ":::" is not bad for me. If not, which character sequence do all of you prefer? Regards, Jessie