Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20535 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5812 invoked by uid 1010); 26 Nov 2005 12:56:46 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5796 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2005 12:56:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Nov 2005 12:56:46 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.162.199 zproxy.gmail.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([64.233.162.199:53345] helo=zproxy.gmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 6B/3D-56276-E8B58834 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 07:56:46 -0500 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l8so394600nzf for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:56:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i77yJzvu6VLyZHXaNkduMoVKd4f076dZjOOAZEJhvpHsgDSR4KfGXNCQQOdasE3xZ+qwCdmwV80yCaMEf2yCBXRBcemcC5366P4pKBjywZgU/IT6tQyNR0skq5uFyq/OnwDSFwV/P9nIClQsU4HyKR/wQGUJ7cUViF6WaRBx7gY= Received: by 10.65.186.13 with SMTP id n13mr9352833qbp; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:56:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.250.20 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:56:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:56:42 +0100 To: Jani Taskinen Cc: Andrei Zmievski , Ilia Alshanetsky , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4387E97B.4040300@prohost.org> <9784192ddeca75a1d77f5536f909b957@gravitonic.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Solution to date issue in 5.1 From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On 11/26/05, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > So you're also for letting PEAR dictate what PHP has and not the oth= er > way around? Somehow this doesn't sound right. No, I do not let Derick decided on his own what should be commited in a last RC. I do not let Derick decides what is good for me (c) or not. This class was added "just because people asked" at some point and was inside #ifdef for a very good reason, this code does not get any agreement, is not stable (see the trivial fix from Tony today). This ext/date problem is something I will hate to see happen again. Not because I also work on that, it is not the 1st time that my proposals are ignored, but because Derick thinks he can do what he wants and when he wants, as a PHP QA member, I find this attitude pathetic. --Pierre