Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20473 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61031 invoked by uid 1010); 26 Nov 2005 01:22:41 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61016 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2005 01:22:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Nov 2005 01:22:41 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.197.172.116 gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([195.197.172.116:40521] helo=gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 97/01-56276-0E8B7834 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:22:40 -0500 Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (YZDCXXXI.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.35.232]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B15DD8C94; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:22:34 +0200 (EET) Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (nest.netphobia.fi [127.0.0.1]) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAQ1Mb2G031166; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:22:37 +0200 Received: from localhost (jani@localhost) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id jAQ1Mb2u031163; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:22:37 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: nest.netphobia.fi: jani owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:22:36 +0200 (EET) Reply-To: Jani Taskinen To: Rasmus Lerdorf cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4386C97D.3030402@lerdorf.com> Message-ID: References: <4386C97D.3030402@lerdorf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fixing this date mess From: sniper@iki.fi (Jani Taskinen) On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > We need to fix this date thing along with the Digest Auth mixup and get a > 5.1.1 out the door soon. I see Ilia committed a fix for the Digest Auth > thing, so assuming that this fix works, we just need to figure out what to do > with this date class. We can either roll back: > > http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/date/php_date.c?r1=1.43.2.20&r2=1.43.2.21&ty=u > > or perhaps a better option is to rename that internal class for now until we Either keep it as is or nuke it forever. But please, no pingpong here. > have a better idea of what this class is going to look like and how we > transition pear/Date users. Naming it date_ex (for experimental) or something > like that for now lets us keep the class constants as they are and hopefully > Derick and Pierre can come to some sort of truce on the actual implementation. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that to happen. > I don't think having this mostly empty date class placeholder helps anybody > right now. It already helped. People woke up. :) Make a big fat notice about it and let it blow things up and we end up with something better. --Jani