Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20402 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4075 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Nov 2005 13:25:07 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4052 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2005 13:25:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 13:25:07 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.160.175.43 p15119030.pureserver.info Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([217.160.175.43:55078] helo=chatserv.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 7F/70-56276-DBB07834 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:03:57 -0500 Received: (qmail 5802 invoked by uid 1040); 25 Nov 2005 13:03:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 13:03:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:03:53 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: sas@chatserv To: Ilia Alshanetsky cc: Derick Rethans , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <438709AC.3020808@prohost.org> Message-ID: References: <7.0.0.16.2.20051124161240.0573e640@zend.com> <20051125034515.6fefa4e2@localhost.localdomain> <43867C6C.2010209@prohost.org> <20051125040950.26305e08@localhost.localdomain> <43869FC5.4060708@lerdorf.com> <20051125075501.79718ee6@localhost.localdomain> <1132903004.9936.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1086017308.20051125091648@marcus-boerger.de> <438709AC.3020808@prohost.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps out there) From: sascha@schumann.cx (Sascha Schumann) On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > Sascha Schumann wrote: >> Then I have to ask both of you: why is there no mentioning in >> the release notes or the upgrading guide regarding "Date" >> being reserved for PHP now? > > There are notes in the guide, and I quote: I've seen that text. It is hidden at the end of a paragraph not related to the topic at all (something about class constants). As such it is totally inadequate. There should be a prominent point in the release announcement about reserved symbols. - Sascha