Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20395
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <1C.B0.56276.B2D07834@pb1.pair.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:09:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7.0.0.16.2.20051124161240.0573e640@zend.com>	<20051125034515.6fefa4e2@localhost.localdomain>	<43867C6C.2010209@prohost.org> <20051125040950.26305e08@localhost.localdomain> <43869FC5.4060708@lerdorf.com>
In-Reply-To: <43869FC5.4060708@lerdorf.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps out there)
From: oliver.graetz@arcor.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Oliver_Gr=E4tz?=)

Rasmus Lerdorf schrieb:
> Pierre, I agree with you that it was a bad idea to turn on the stub date 
> class in the final release candidate giving people less than a week to 
> notice that we now conflict with a common pear class.  We get all the 
> breakage and none of the benefits and nobody had any time to prepare the 
> pear side of the house for this.  It also sucks that not a single pear 
> person tested the final RC and brought this up in the past week.  There 
> is plenty of blame to go around here.

Less than a week? OK; I'm just a private programmer and not from the
PEAR team. I am not compiling my own PHP, I use Debian with the ~dexter
builds. I got my RC6 YESTERDAY! And it breaks my code. I would have
commented on this but just minutes later I learned that 5.1.0 had been
released.

Five minutes notice, now that's tight schedule.

OLLi