Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20388
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:33:12 +0100
Message-ID: <00A2E2156BEE8446A81C8881AE117F192C1D0C@companyweb>
Thread-Topic: AW: [PHP-DEV] Re: PDM Meeting Notes
Thread-Index: AcXxsQV6xO7kOf5LQy2JE97bNrmkYgACzCvA
To: "Andreas Ahlenstorf" <lists@ahlenstorf.ch>
Cc: "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
Subject: AW: AW: [PHP-DEV] Re: PDM Meeting Notes
From: mp@webfactory.de ("Matthias Pigulla")


> >> I have always maintained that shared hosts should be running=20
> >> per-security context Apache instances as different users.
> >
> > The problem with that is that it makes name-based virtual=20
> hosts pretty=20
> > pointless because each apache instance will at least need an ip=20
> > address on its own.
>=20
> It seems you've never heard of suexec, FastCGI, MPM Perchild=20
> (ok, this one is broken) and Zeus (has nothing to do with=20
> Apache, but is a good product). It's possible to have name=20
> based virtual hosts in
> Apache2 and PHP processes running in the context of every=20
> user with a patched suexec, mod_fastcgi and one single IP.

I do have - but to me the recommendation above sounded like running a
difference apache instance (i. e. main server process) for every
security context.

-mp.