Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20386 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71186 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Nov 2005 12:23:07 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71171 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2005 12:23:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 12:23:07 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.38.9.232 gw2.emini.dk Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([192.38.9.232:7692] helo=gw2.emini.dk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id F0/BD-56276-A2207834 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:23:06 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.18] (palestine.intra.emini.dk [10.0.0.18]) by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9841E90A69; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:23:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43870226.10807@emini.dk> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:23:02 +0100 Organization: Emini A/S User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans Cc: Christian Schneider , Sascha Schumann , internals@lists.php.net References: <7.0.0.16.2.20051124161240.0573e640@zend.com> <20051125034515.6fefa4e2@localhost.localdomain> <43867C6C.2010209@prohost.org> <20051125040950.26305e08@localhost.localdomain> <43869FC5.4060708@lerdorf.com> <20051125075501.79718ee6@localhost.localdomain> <1132903004.9936.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1086017308.20051125091648@marcus-boerger.de> <4386F325.5020102@cschneid.com> <4386FBB7.3010200@cschneid.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=157D0FA8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps outthere) From: edink@emini.dk (Edin Kadribasic) Derick Rethans wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Christian Schneider wrote: > > >>Just to illustrate some question which could be raised to weaken your point >>that Date is the one and only name for that class: >>Why does it include time as well, shouldn't it be Datetime (a la SQL)? Is it >>going to be the only class in ext/date (no, there is already timezone)? => >>Shouldn't it be Date_Timezone and Date_Date/Date_Datetime then? > > > No, why should it? We reserve the right to use whatever name we want in > the core (although prefixing internal classes with Pear would be sneaky ;-) ) Who is "we"? People bent on making life as difficult as possible for PHP users? I'm sure you're not talking about the broad range of people here and I would appreciate if you didn't make it sound like most of PHP developers are behind your methods and attitude here. Sneaking in date class like that is really unacceptable, and 5.1.1 with it removed should be released ASAP. Edin