Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20363 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21998 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Nov 2005 10:58:09 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21983 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2005 10:58:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 10:58:09 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:41212] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 86/56-56276-F3EE6834 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 05:58:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAPAw43i030339; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:58:04 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAPAvx0m030326; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:57:59 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:57:59 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Sascha Schumann cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <7.0.0.16.2.20051124161240.0573e640@zend.com> <20051125034515.6fefa4e2@localhost.localdomain> <43867C6C.2010209@prohost.org> <20051125040950.26305e08@localhost.localdomain> <43869FC5.4060708@lerdorf.com> <20051125075501.79718ee6@localhost.localdomain> <1132903004.9936.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1086017308.20051125091648@marcus-boerger.de> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps out there) From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > It's definitely not the most elegant way, I agree there. But there was > > also no sneaking as it was discussed months before, and it was actually > > Ilia who suggested doing it in PHP 5.1.0 and not 5.1.1. > > Then I have to ask both of you: why is there no mentioning in > the release notes or the upgrading guide regarding "Date" > being reserved for PHP now? I thought it was actually, as I saw somebody quoting this. > It gets worde because there apparently has been _no_ > documentation of the fact at all. How shall our users > prepare themselves appropiately? This is why I petition to ammend the release notes ASAP. > I move that the class is renamed for the time being as to not > conflict with existing codebases, and release 5.1.1 > expediently. Yes, and that will break code again as I just explained to Sebastian Kettler. And it will break *my* code ;-) Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org