Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20325 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45103 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Nov 2005 02:52:33 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45088 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2005 02:52:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 02:52:33 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 70.85.46.36 unknown Received: from ([70.85.46.36:57281] helo=prohost.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id B4/50-11378-17C76834 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:52:33 -0500 Received: (qmail 13950 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2005 02:52:30 -0000 Received: from prohost.org (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (70.85.46.36) by prohost.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 02:52:30 -0000 Message-ID: <43867C6C.2010209@prohost.org> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:52:28 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pierre.php@gmail.com CC: internals@lists.php.net, Andi Gutmans References: <7.0.0.16.2.20051124161240.0573e640@zend.com> <20051125034515.6fefa4e2@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20051125034515.6fefa4e2@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps out there) From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky) Pierre wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:15:04 -0800 > andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) wrote: > > >>Hey, >> >>Just wanted to thank everyone who helped get PHP 5.1 out of the door >>after a lot of efforts. >>Special thanks to Steph who stepped up to make the upgrading guide >>happen. I think this should become a standard for future PHP releases. >>Also thanks to Ilia who picked up the last few rounds of PHP 5.1 >>release management to make it happen. >> >>Well done everyone! > > > Well Done Derick who did again what's the hell he wants. Pierre first of all I put the change in after a discussion with Derick and a number of the while you were present btw. This was done to declare the date class for "future" proofing and allow isolation of date constants into a class, as is done for all new OO extensions. > If anyone can show me we agreed to put the crappy (yes crappy) new date > object ON by default in 5.1.0. I'll pretend that by "crappy" you mean limited, which it is because all the methods are disabled till 5.1.1 when we will enable them to allow a extensive test cycle. Ilia