Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20292 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33535 invoked by uid 1010); 24 Nov 2005 11:23:16 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33520 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2005 11:23:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Nov 2005 11:23:16 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.197.172.115 gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([195.197.172.115:39761] helo=gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id F5/A0-11378-A92A5834 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:23:06 -0500 Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (YZDCXXXI.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.35.232]) by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E30110102A; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:22:56 +0200 (EET) Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (nest.netphobia.fi [127.0.0.1]) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAOBMvgq022398; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:22:57 +0200 Received: from localhost (jani@localhost) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id jAOBMve2022395; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:22:57 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: nest.netphobia.fi: jani owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:22:56 +0200 (EET) Reply-To: Jani Taskinen To: Matthias Pigulla cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <00A2E2156BEE8446A81C8881AE117F192C1C96@companyweb> Message-ID: References: <00A2E2156BEE8446A81C8881AE117F192C1C96@companyweb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] Re: PDM Meeting Notes From: sniper@iki.fi (Jani Taskinen) On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Matthias Pigulla wrote: > > Admittedly this is ugly to read but the same thing on the other side is > $var[$x][$y] vs. $var[$x]{$y}. True. But having two purposes for {} is not good either. And most of the time it's up to the coders how they use the existing features..so this is all pointless. :) > Oh, btw: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_purism: "Linguistic > purism is the opposition to any changes of a given language, or the desire > to undo some changes the language has undergone in the past." So what do > the anti-purists want here? "Anti-purism: A puristic reaction to a > manifestation of purism, directed at the removal of neologisms originating > from a puristic intervention." Damn wikipedia. :) --Jani