Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:20050 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61650 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Nov 2005 07:23:32 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61633 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2005 07:23:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Nov 2005 07:23:32 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:48853] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 59/4B-07637-47EDA734 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 02:23:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAG7NC7C020325; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:23:12 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAG7N8BE020317; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:23:09 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:23:08 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Andrei Zmievski cc: Wez Furlong , Rasmus Lerdorf , Jani Taskinen , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <5D7AB792-4788-4C97-B523-7E15DAAB16E9@gravitonic.com> Message-ID: References: <437A0D24.6030701@caedmon.net> <20051115181307.18c2b27b@localhost.localdomain> <437A1820.8060902@lerdorf.com> <437A1BD1.9030309@lerdorf.com> <4e89b4260511150942g6f3cab3boad1c09eb1c1e7318@mail.gmail.com> <5D7AB792-4788-4C97-B523-7E15DAAB16E9@gravitonic.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] date() behaviour changed in 5.1? From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > Perhaps, but I would maintain that passing "123abc" and having it interpreted > as 123 is still wrong. Yeah, I lean that way too, although trailing whitespace should be supported IMO. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org