Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19894 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40769 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Nov 2005 23:03:42 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40754 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2005 23:03:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Nov 2005 23:03:42 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([212.112.227.169:49940] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 7A/47-56573-EC549634 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:03:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C253DF0064; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:03:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ipx11223 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01658-03; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:03:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i577B57E4.versanet.de [87.123.87.228]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E4ADF0043; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:03:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <436945C0.1050104@php.net> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:03:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wez Furlong Cc: Andrey Nikolaev , internals@lists.php.net References: <6C.6D.02082.522D8634@pb1.pair.com> <4e89b4260511020701g7c6de8c8s7c064de9574c9b09@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4e89b4260511020701g7c6de8c8s7c064de9574c9b09@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Is it necessary to have different DSN formats in PDO ? From: lsmith@php.net (Lukas Smith) Wez Furlong wrote: > That's one of the reasons why we don't do it. I once proposed that every driver should atleast be able to generate a DSN from an array through an optional function. However since I never implemented and nobody else stepped out it never materialized. regards, Lukas