Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19696 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 84372 invoked by uid 1010); 23 Oct 2005 20:07:24 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 84357 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2005 20:07:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Oct 2005 20:07:24 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.74.107.235:38992] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 55/EC-22302-A7DEB534 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:07:23 -0400 Received: (qmail 4635 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2005 20:07:17 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 23 Oct 2005 20:07:17 -0000 Message-ID: <435BED75.9000409@zend.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:07:17 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (X11/20051006) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: techtonik CC: Wez Furlong , internals@lists.php.net References: <1083412052.20051022123025@tut.by> <4e89b4260510220804n11c60ef9mbb63fd533e7deebb@mail.gmail.com> <4e89b4260510220854k7b52582fn98379ee45764365@mail.gmail.com> <4e89b4260510221006j46b02361paf48ca7a16979ab4@mail.gmail.com> <143589707.20051023204354@tut.by> In-Reply-To: <143589707.20051023204354@tut.by> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re[2]: PHP 4 win build system questions From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 23.10.2005 22:43, techtonik wrote: > I might be compenent, but it was a waste of time. I'm not an OOP > programmer and I don't like PHP 5 yet. I could never understand people saying that PHP5 is about OOP. It's like saying that kernel 2.6 is about desktop. True, PHP5 has improved OO support, but that doesn't mean that it hurts procedural style in any way. If you want more stable PHP version - update it regularly. Staying with DOS 6.22 and saying that you don't like those new OSes may be fine, but it doesn't make much sense to me.. > Maybe you need to expand developers base somehow or make advanced > hot patch submission/review/approval/integration system on top of > chora, so less time will be wasted to review patch submissions. That still doesn't add much point to supporting 4 branches (4, 5.0, 5.1 & HEAD) in the same time. Actually I would object even if you want to do it yourself. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal