Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19695 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80691 invoked by uid 1010); 23 Oct 2005 19:48:05 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80676 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2005 19:48:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Oct 2005 19:48:05 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.209.41.194 speedy.tutby.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([195.209.41.194:47721] helo=tut.by) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 21/AC-22302-4F8EB534 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 15:48:05 -0400 Received: from [194.158.213.80] (account techtonik HELO [194.158.213.80]) by tut.by (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTPA id 7116704; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:47:51 +0300 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:43:54 +0200 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/8) Personal Reply-To: techtonik Organization: from radioactive Belarus with love X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <143589707.20051023204354@tut.by> To: Wez Furlong CC: techtonik , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4e89b4260510221006j46b02361paf48ca7a16979ab4@mail.gmail.com> References: <1083412052.20051022123025@tut.by> <4e89b4260510220804n11c60ef9mbb63fd533e7deebb@mail.gmail.com> <4e89b4260510220854k7b52582fn98379ee45764365@mail.gmail.com> <4e89b4260510221006j46b02361paf48ca7a16979ab4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: PHP 4 win build system questions From: techtonik@tut.by (techtonik) ||*()*|| [\..konnichi wa, ogenki desu ka, Wez../] >> Is there any developers who officially supports PHP 4 branch? WF> Yes, we "support" people using it, but not so much people building it. WF> We're trying to shift people on to PHP 5 so that the support burden WF> is lessened. If you're building it yourself, you're competent enough WF> to support yourself building it. I might be compenent, but it was a waste of time. I'm not an OOP programmer and I don't like PHP 5 yet. Thought I'm not alone. I better not to deal with PHP 5 if you're going to support it like that when PHP 6 is out. Just wanted to help. I forgot about C long ago and do not have too much experience to answer stupid questions myself. Sorry to bother you. Maybe you need to expand developers base somehow or make advanced hot patch submission/review/approval/integration system on top of chora, so less time will be wasted to review patch submissions. >> > Don't forget that we have full-on win32 builds being generated >> > courtesy of Edin, along with several snapshot builds throughout the >> > day for all branches of PHP and PECL; there should be very little need >> > for people to build their own, unless they are hacking on PHP >> > itself--those people should be maintaining their own build >> > environments. >> >> I think I've got the idea. Should. Bye. WF> All I'm trying to say is that we have the things the way they are WF> because its easier and less time consuming for most people using and WF> developing PHP; don't let me discourage you. Do as you wish. WBR.techtonik -- (B)uilding, (A)ntenna, (S)pan and (E)arth * terminal velocity - 54m/s, 305m *