Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19512 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28641 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Oct 2005 13:55:56 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28626 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2005 13:55:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Oct 2005 13:55:56 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.74.107.235:59192] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 3D/FD-54476-BEFC7434 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 09:55:55 -0400 Received: (qmail 10371 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2005 13:55:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO zeev-notebook.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Oct 2005 13:55:50 -0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20051008155416.09e525c0@localhost> X-Sender: zeev@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 15:55:51 +0200 To: Christian Stocker Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4347CD3D.5000302@bitflux.ch> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20051008152435.09df8390@localhost> <5.1.0.14.2.20051008152435.09df8390@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Timezone stuff - conclusion From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) At 15:44 08/10/2005, Christian Stocker wrote: >On 8.10.2005 15:30 Uhr, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > I've been away from email for the last couple of weeks - read through > > the timezone thread, and didn't really see a conclusion. > >IIRC the conclusion was, that Derick tries to make the TZ detection >better (which was the only BC problem, AFAIK). And according to him, >that's now almost solved (except some weird problems on Windows). > >He even made a pecl package for updating the TZ data easily should that >change. > >If the TZ detection works reliable, I don't see any reason to revert or >postpone Dericks work, the timezone handling of his implementation is so >much better than the old one, it's really worth the upgrade for everyone >having to deal with different timezones. Ok, maybe I missed it in the lengthy thread. Contrary to what Derick may have thought from my response, I wasn't trying to reopen the discussion, just to make sure it doesn't linger to death. Zeev