Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19496 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59020 invoked by uid 1010); 7 Oct 2005 21:46:07 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59005 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2005 21:46:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Oct 2005 21:46:07 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 lerdorf.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([204.11.219.139:53031] helo=colo.lerdorf.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 6A/E6-54476-F9CE6434 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:46:07 -0400 Received: from [192.168.10.100] (dsl-80-42-4-191.access.as9105.com [80.42.4.191]) (authenticated bits=0) by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-2) with ESMTP id j97Lk02O022431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:46:03 -0700 Message-ID: <4346EC97.20001@lerdorf.com> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:45:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: Ilia Alshanetsky , George Schlossnagle , PHP Developers Mailing List References: <99dd4f75f4ceebfe1c980cf439e97416@gravitonic.com> <4346E00A.8020504@prohost.org> <4346E0C5.3090001@lerdorf.com> <4346EABE.6000706@prohost.org> <4346EB85.4020509@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Unicode Implementation From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) Derick Rethans wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > >>>Assuming that 5.1 would be actively maintained and not just for bug >>>fixes, I'd say that is a viable approach. There are plenty of sites that >>> have no use for Unicode as nice as it may be, and much rather retain >>>performance over useless (for them) functionality. >> >>So, you are saying that something like the namespace patch would be >>added between 5.1.2 and 5.1.3, for example? That doesn't make much >>sense to me. > > > True, but doing it between 5.1.1 and 5.2.0 would work. Right, so effectively the 5.x and 6.x trees would mimic each other. Even major versions = unicode, odd version = non-unicode. I suppose it is an approach, but I think it is a confusing one. -Rasmus