Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19494 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56662 invoked by uid 1010); 7 Oct 2005 21:43:17 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56647 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2005 21:43:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Oct 2005 21:43:17 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:55105] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id F1/86-54476-3FBE6434 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:43:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j97LhAJF031006; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:43:10 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j97Lh7n1030992; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:43:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:43:08 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Rasmus Lerdorf cc: Ilia Alshanetsky , George Schlossnagle , PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: <4346EB85.4020509@lerdorf.com> Message-ID: References: <99dd4f75f4ceebfe1c980cf439e97416@gravitonic.com> <4346E00A.8020504@prohost.org> <4346E0C5.3090001@lerdorf.com> <4346EABE.6000706@prohost.org> <4346EB85.4020509@lerdorf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Unicode Implementation From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > Assuming that 5.1 would be actively maintained and not just for bug > > fixes, I'd say that is a viable approach. There are plenty of sites that > > have no use for Unicode as nice as it may be, and much rather retain > > performance over useless (for them) functionality. > > So, you are saying that something like the namespace patch would be > added between 5.1.2 and 5.1.3, for example? That doesn't make much > sense to me. True, but doing it between 5.1.1 and 5.2.0 would work. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org