Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19478 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17622 invoked by uid 1010); 7 Oct 2005 16:45:47 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17607 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2005 16:45:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Oct 2005 16:45:47 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 lerdorf.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([204.11.219.139:47992] helo=colo.lerdorf.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id B5/A5-54476-936A6434 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:45:46 -0400 Received: from [192.168.10.100] (dsl-80-42-4-191.access.as9105.com [80.42.4.191]) (authenticated bits=0) by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-2) with ESMTP id j97GjZsl031363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:45:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4346A630.2040400@lerdorf.com> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:45:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Piotr Roszatycki CC: Wez Furlong , internals@lists.php.net References: <200510071012.50604.Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl> <200510071531.11824.Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl> <4e89b4260510070723l1f507167ye8e64c64068348e2@mail.gmail.com> <200510071654.45525.Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl> In-Reply-To: <200510071654.45525.Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS tarball From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > On Friday 07 of October 2005 16:23, Wez Furlong wrote: > >>I honestly don't see how it will be any better than CVS, if the data >>comes from CVS in the first place. >> >>Since we've generally got our plates full, we don't have the resources >>to support third parties maintaining their own forks. We'd much >>rather have those third parties working directly with us so that forks >>are not necessary. > > > I should redirect you to SVK website (http://svk.elixus.org/) and especially > to http://svk.elixus.org/?SingleUserSVK > http://svk.elixus.org/?SyncReposBetweenServers and > http://svk.elixus.org/?SVKAsAProxyForCVSMirror > This is the better tool and designer to make the life much simpler, not more > complicated. > > I.e. with CVS you can't get the diff of one commit for more that one file, > because the revisions are per file, not per repository. You can't find which > files was modified i.e. with "Fixed bug #34358" message without cvs2cl tool. > You have to dig the CVS repository and carefully read the log messages. It is > just one operation with Subversion. > > Why don't you just provide the CVS tarball like for Sourceforge's projects? > Theirs tarballs are available as > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/PROJECTNAME-cvsroot.tar.bz2 Just use cvsup: http://www.php.net/cvsup.php -Rasmus