Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19438 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96416 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Oct 2005 10:33:59 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96401 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2005 10:33:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Oct 2005 10:33:59 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.237.67.135 213.237.67.135.adsl.by.worldonline.dk Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([213.237.67.135:24672] helo=mail.ter.dk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 9C/CE-54476-79DF4434 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 06:33:59 -0400 Received: from workpenguin (workpenguin [192.168.1.32]) by mail.ter.dk (Symaskine) with SMTP id 6F9118A4011 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:33:56 +0200 (CEST) To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:33:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: CLI in PHP6 From: php@ter.dk (Peter Brodersen) On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:48:51 +0200, in php.internals r.korving@xit.nl ("Ron Korving") wrote: >There was once (can't remember when exactly, so it must be a long time = ago) >here on PHP CLI scripts in which it came forward that one should not = rely on >such a script to run forever. And it's true; the scripts sometimes = magically >and suddenly die. Now I have no clue where this instability (for lack of= a >better word) comes from, but could it be possible for this to be = resolved >for PHP6 so that PHP becomes an extremely viable solution for CLI daemon >scripts? Jani mentioned in http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D34483 : "Running a PHP for 24 hours (under windows) is REALLY not supported or suggested. It's definately nothing to do with PHP but your OS." (and "Try this on a real OS, like Linux") Maybe this was what you were thinking of. I can't see any reason for that statement, though. --=20 - Peter Brodersen