Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pear.dev Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19401 php.pear.dev:40089 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25310 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Oct 2005 15:10:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25289 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2005 15:10:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Oct 2005 15:10:03 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.149.123.177 mail.aaaa.ws Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([83.149.123.177:49839] helo=mail.aaaa.ws) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 76/6F-54476-A4B92434 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:10:02 -0400 Received: from cpc2-sout5-5-0-cust53.sot3.cable.ntl.com ([81.110.110.53] helo=[192.168.1.103]) by mail.aaaa.ws with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1EMoQW-0005nK-D1; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:09:56 +0200 Message-ID: <43429B4B.6020103@teh.ath.cx> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:10:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050912) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: Greg Beaver , Curt Zirzow , internals@lists.php.net, pear-dev@lists.php.net References: <433EA995.50304@chiaraquartet.net> <434204B3.2000703@chiaraquartet.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: phar and e_strict From: matthew@teh.ath.cx (Matthew Kavanagh) Derick Rethans wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Greg Beaver wrote: > > >>> 1. zlib is required now with php, and by default php isn't installed >>> with zlib nor does configure catch this, so, while make install is >>> running and when pear is being installed make dies leaving a bad >>> installation. >> >>I could eliminate this requirement, at the expense of a larger .phar >>file (3.3MB instead of 640k). > > > Please don't do that, as this is going to be part of a release tarball. Would that really be a problem, given that compressing a compressed file and compressing an uncompressed file will usually yield similar sized resultant files?