Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19378 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67014 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Oct 2005 09:08:21 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 66999 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2005 09:08:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Oct 2005 09:08:21 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([212.112.227.169:35431] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 98/00-54476-48642434 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:08:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F74ADF0070; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 11:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ipx11223 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13793-02; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 11:08:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i577B5FE2.versanet.de [87.123.95.226]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D92DF0069; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 11:08:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4342466E.2040406@php.net> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:07:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <20051001162402.4dc07ea1@localhost.localdomain> <1528716499.20051001164847@marcus-boerger.de> <4342448F.10308@php.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: phar and e_strict From: lsmith@php.net (Lukas Smith) Derick Rethans wrote: >>We are not ignoring it. However the single most useful feature from PEAR POV >>was dropped from PHP5: namespaces. > > > That's lame, this has nothing to do with E_STRICT warnings or other > dubious code. How is it dubious to support PHP4 and PHP5 with the same code base? There have been definate improvements, no doubt about that. But nothing grand enough to say: "he lets start from scratch". regards, Lukas