Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19328
Return-Path: <steph@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 98814 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Oct 2005 01:38:06 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 98799 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2005 01:38:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Oct 2005 01:38:06 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.38.9.232 gw2.emini.dk Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from ([192.38.9.232:2333] helo=gw2.emini.dk)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id DA/D7-54476-DF93F334 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 21:38:05 -0400
Received: from foxbox (1Cust6.tnt103.lnd4.gbr.da.uu.net [213.116.54.6])
	by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 76877856DA; Sun,  2 Oct 2005 03:38:00 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <0d4601c5c6f1$f0323f50$90406551@foxbox>
Reply-To: "Steph" <steph@zend.com>
To: "Jani Taskinen" <sniper@iki.fi>
Cc: "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <0ca601c5c6b5$844805e0$90406551@foxbox> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510020241180.2879@arfg.argcubovn.sv>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 02:38:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PHP-GTK-DEV] PHP-GTK2 mysql Extensions? 
From: steph@zend.com ("Steph")

I thought it was only me and Zeev that didn't like it :)

So can we make a policy over this and write it in stone somewhere?

Or do we have to write it in water?

ps your new 'limited period' sig is rather wonderful...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jani Taskinen" <sniper@iki.fi>
To: "Steph" <steph@zend.com>
Cc: "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PHP-GTK-DEV] PHP-GTK2 mysql Extensions?


>
>      This has NOT been the policy. The person who came up with
>      this stupid idea should be punis..informed about it.
>
>      There's this nice download-server running thttpd (IIRC)
>      somewhere where the RCs and such USED to be put.
>
>      (dejavu or did I actually mention about this earlier? :)
>
>      --Jani
>
> -- 
> Give me your money at @ <http://pecl.php.net/wishlist.php/sniper>
> Donating money may make me happier and friendlier for a limited period!
> Death to all 4 letter abbreviations starting with P!
>
>
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Steph wrote:
>
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > You don't need to read the whole of the history below, but doing so
might
> > help to illustrate some of the confusion caused by distributing PHP
release
> > candidates and extension packs on the php.net downloads page alongside
the
> > official PHP releases.
> >
> > Can we re-think this policy, please?
> >
> > My own feeling is that RCs shouldn't be announced in this way, but I
know
> > you all want a broad test base for them.
> >
> > Perhaps we could make them available via a separate download page with a
> > header and text making it fully clear these are not PHP releases?
> >
> > - Steph
> >
> >