Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:19313 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83453 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Oct 2005 14:48:37 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83437 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2005 14:48:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Oct 2005 14:48:37 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([81.169.182.136:51814] helo=strato.aixcept.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id F7/40-54476-4C1AE334 for ; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 10:48:36 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dslb-082-083-226-200.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.83.226.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B7C35C36E; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:49:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:48:47 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1528716499.20051001164847@marcus-boerger.de> To: Pierre Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <20051001162402.4dc07ea1@localhost.localdomain> References: <20051001162402.4dc07ea1@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: phar and e_strict From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Pierre, Saturday, October 1, 2005, 4:24:02 PM, you wrote: > On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:17:19 +0200 (CEST) > derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) wrote: >> 1. not modify any error reporting setting > We have to modify it as the underlying code is not php5 _only_ but have > to work for both php5 and php4. >> 2. PHP 5.1 compatible code. > It is compatible, or do you mean E_STRICK compatible? You should face reality that php 5 is a bit different than php 4. Many of the things changed in php 5 were made to support exactly pear development but pear is absolutley ignoring it. Why can't at least the things that shall be shipped in 5.1 fashion - especially since you're doing part of it in a way only 5.1 can serve anyway. Best regards, Marcus